Monash home | About Monash | Faculties | Campuses | Courses | Contact Monash |
Staff directory | A-Z index | Site map |
70. Disputed ClassificationsClassification Review Committee70.1 A staff member aggrieved by a review of classification decision may apply for a review of the decision by the Classification Review Committee, which will comprise the following members who will be trained in the use of the classification descriptors: (a) the nominee of the Vice-President (Administration); (b) a nominee of the Dean/Divisional Director of the area in which the staff member is located; and (c) two nominees of the NTEU Branch President. All nominees will be selected in a timely fashion. The application to the Classification Review Committee will attach the position description and the review proposal form for the Committee's reference. 70.2 The Committee will take into account relativities with other comparable positions across the University when considering the application and will act in accordance with the following terms of reference:
Position Description Review Committee70.3 Where the content of a position description, or a proposal that forms the basis of a reclassification application, is in dispute the position description may be referred to a Position Description Review Committee made up of one University HR representative and one NTEU representative along with the supervisor and staff member. The Committee will attempt to reach agreement on the position description so that it can be processed by the relevant Classification Committee. Where the position description is subsequently reclassified by the Classification Committee, the date of effect of the reclassification will be no later than two months from the time discussions between the supervisor and staff member began. Should the Committee fail to reach agreement on the position description the staff member may request that the matter be referred to the Dispute Resolution Procedure at clause 12. |